👂 🎴 🕸️
Repetition
of
morphological
or
lexical
units
is
an
established
technique
able
to
reinforce
the
impact
of
one
’
s
argument
upon
the
audience
.
Rhetoric
tradition
has
canonized
dozens
of
repetition
-
involving
schemata
as
figures
of
speech
.
Our
article
shows
a
way
how
hitherto
ignored
repetition
-
involving
schemata
can
be
identified
.
It
shows
that
certain
classes
of
repetitive
figures
can
be
represented
in
terms
of
specific
sequences
of
integer
numbers
and
vice
versa
''
how
specific
sets
of
integer
numbers
can
be
translated
into
sets
of
regexes
able
to
match
repetition
-
involving
expressions
.
A
„
Shakespeare
number
“
S
is
simply
defined
as
an
integer
with
at
least
one
repeated
digit
in
which
no
digit
bigger
than
X
can
occur
if
ever
a
digit
X
had
not
yet
occurred
in
S
’
s
decimal
representation
.
Hence
''
121
is
a
Shakespeare
number
''
while
123
or
211
are
not
.
A
set
of
„
entangled
numbers
“
is
subsequently
defined
as
a
subset
of
„
Shakespeare
numbers
“
with
an
additional
property
that
all
digits
which
occur
in
them
are
repeated
at
least
twice
in
the
decimal
representation
of
the
number
.
Thus
''
a
1212
is
an
entangled
number
while
1211
is
not
.
A
complete
set
E
of
entangled
numbers
of
maximal
length
of
10
digits
is
subsequently
generated
and
every
member
of
E
is
translated
into
a
regex
.
Each
regex
is
subsequently
exposed
to
all
utterances
in
all
works
of
William
Shakespeare
''
allowing
us
to
pinpoint
3367
instances
of
172
distinct
E
-
schemata
.
This
nomenclature
may
allow
scholars
to
lead
a
discussion
about
schemata
which
have
escaped
the
attention
of
classical
interpretators
.
I
'
m
really
mystified
about
what
this
is
all
about
.
The
concept
of
a
regular
expression
(
regex
)
is
straightforward
.
But
frankly
the
meaning
of
how
regular
expressions
are
being
used
is
completely
opaque
to
me
.
The
statement
:
„
Each
regex
is
subsequently
exposed
to
all
utterances
in
all
works
of
William
Shakespeare
''
allowing
us
to
pinpoint
many
interesting
expressions
and
their
distributions
.
“
...
sounds
that
there
is
something
worthwhile
going
on
here
but
it
'
s
vague
to
the
point
of
being
incomprehensible
.
It
does
not
appear
to
have
much
to
do
with
argumentation
.
I
do
not
think
it
would
be
of
interest
to
readers
of
Argument
and
Computation
.
It
may
be
of
interest
to
a
digital
humanities
/
rhetoric
journal
.
[Impressum, Datenschutz, Login] Other subprojects of udk.ai linkring: gardens.digital refused.science baumhaus.digital teacher.solar fibel.digital